Mistrust is always inherent in the relationship between the President and the Vice-President. Even if they deny it, it is constantly there. The office of the Vice President is generally considered to be the graveyard of political careers. It is a lonely office. It is also a miserable office. The name vice means “in place of”. It typically serves as a pro-tempore (Latin) for the time being to the President.

Former US Vice-President, Walter Mondale says “since the start of our nation, the vice presidency has been an awkward office, its occupants have, by and large, been notoriously unhappy.”

In Nigeria the office of the Vice President is a solitary office, so desolate that it has an unelected official-the Chief of Staff to the President around, who is not recognized by the Constitution and who the President directed must be the safest and best gateway to his office. The directive which is abnormal and atypical has not been abrogated inspite of the demise of the former holder of the office. That directive makes the office of the Vice President to be extremely intricate and complex. Vice Presidents suffer and endure in silence. In some cases they are targets of attacks, ridicule and fake news. The worst thing is that there is little they can do about it. Getting out of sight is a solution most favoured by Presidents, hence, most often the job schedule of vice presidents is to attend funerals, birthdays, anniversaries, lectures, seminars, retreat, etc. They do not really belong to the inner caucus of the President. If anything goes wrong they are always suspects. In 1979, the most powerful person in the country by then, apart from President Usman Aliyu Shehu Shagari (25 February, 1925-December 28 2018), GCFR, was not his Vice President, Dr. Alexander Ifeanyichukwu Ekwueme (1932-2017) but the then Minister of Transport, Alhaji Umaru Abdurahman Dikko (1936-2014). The excuse for this then was that the ruling National Party of Nigeria (NPN) did not win in Anambra state, the home state of Dr. Ekwueme or in Imo state. In the 1979 elections, Dr. Nnamdi Benjamin Azikiwe (16 November 1904 – 11 May 1996), GCFR, of the NPP still controlled his empire of Imo and Anambra states. If you wanted anything in Shagari’s era, you need to contact Alhaji Umaru Dikko, who was also the Chairman of the Presidential Taskforce on Rice. The argument then was that, Dr. Ekwueme had no electoral asset or political base in 1979. That argument was demolished in 1999 in that President Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR, was not voted by the people of his own region, the Southwest region. The man the people of Southwest voted for in 1999, Chief Samuel Oluyemi Falae (82) from Oyemekun land in Ondo state, by irony was himself a recipient of General Obasanjo’s generosity when he made him Permanent Secretary in 1977 and also introduced him to General Ibrahim Babangida (80, GCFR), who made him Secretary to the Government of the Federation in 1985.

Perhaps the weakness of the office of the Vice President in Nigeria since 1999 could be traced to the effect that there has not been mutual relationship between the President and the Vice President before they were appointed Vice President. The process for selecting Vice President in this country since 1999 is faulty.

For example, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar (GCON) was the PDP candidate for the January 9 gubernatorial election in Adamawa State in 1999. He was not close to President Obasanjo who was the presidential nominee of the PDP at that time. His financial purse and a little help from some of his friends, including Otunba Oyewole Fasawe, Chief Tony Anenih prevailed on Chief Olusegun Obasanjo to make Atiku Abubakar as the vice presidential candidate for the PDP, over Alhaji Adamu Ciroma, Alhaji Abubakar Rimi and Professor Jerry Gana, after the PDP convention held in Jos on February 16, 1999. Atiku’s running mate at that time as deputy governor Boni Haruna, later became governor by defeating Bala Takaya by 329,595 to 283,863 votes in the 1999 Adamawa state gubernatorial election. In the December 16, 2006 convention held in Abuja, it was President Obasanjo who forced Dr. Goodluck Jonathan (GCFR), then governor of Bayelsa State on President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua (GCFR), to be his running mate. Alhaji Umaru Yar’adua (August 16, 1951 – May 5, 2010) preferred either Dr Peter Odili (73) or Chief James Onanafe Ibori (62). President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan picked Alhaji Namadi Sambo (67), the former governor of Kaduna State, to be his vice president on May 19, 2010, following pressure from the governor’s forum, who wanted their own to be vice president. President Muhammadu Buhari picked Professor Yemi Osinbajo (GCON), in very interesting circumstances. The rejection of the Muslim/Muslim was floated in 2014 because certain elements within the APC at that time never wanted Chief Bola Tinubu to be Vice President.

In fairness, President Muhammadu Buhari fulfilled his obligation to Chief Bola Tinubu at that time.

On December 11, 2014, President Muhammadu Buhari defeated his political rivals in the APC with 3,430 votes; Dr Rabiu Kwankaso had 974 votes; Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, 954 votes; Governor Rochas Okorocha, 624 votes, with Dr. Kayode Fayemi as the returning officer at the Teslim Balogun stadium in Lagos at the party’s Convention.

In order to calm nerves down, General Buhari left the decision to pick the Vice President in the hands of Chief Bola Tinubu. He could have picked Chief Pius Olu Akinyelure (79), a former Mobil Chief Executive, who is a Methodist Knight. He could as well have picked Chief Olusegun Osoba (82), the twice elected governor of Ogun state. He could have dared his critics as well and picked Chief Bisi Akande, a Muslim and a former governor of Osun state and Ogbeni Rauf Adesoji Aregbesola (64), former governor of Osun state, now Minister of Interior Affairs and the course of history would have changed by now.

A few days later Chief Tinubu picked Professor Yemi Osinbajo. Professor Yemi Osinbajo, a Victoria Garden City (VGC), Lagos resident and a pastor with the Redeemed Christian Church of God had earlier served as the Commissioner of Justice during the tenure of Chief Bola Tinubu as the governor of Lagos State. It was the costliest decision made by Chief Tinubu, a human developer, in his political career. The question now is what has he gained from that decision.

Either vice presidents have political base or structure, the office is a futile job, full of frustrations. The vice presidency is like the human appendix, a vestigial organ on the body politic. It is difficult for a President to take the Vice President completely into his confidence. The President by necessity builds his own staff and makes his own decision and the Vice President remains an outsider. Even at present, the incumbent Vice-President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo cannot be claimed to belong to the so called CABAL, the inner caucus ruling the country, made mostly of CPC members who have become stupendously rich in the last six years and this has drawn jealousy of other APC members. Afterwards the ruling APC government was founded by members drawn from DPP, APGA, CPC, ACN, ANPP and disgruntled PDP members.

For example most ministers, if not all, owe their loyalty to the president for appointing them and not to the vice president. Even the present vice president could not nominate a minister from his own state of Ogun. That privilege was given to Governor Ibikunle Amosun, who first nominated Mrs Kemi Adeosun (55) six years ago. The same Ibikunle Amosun who is now a senator further nominated Mr Olamilekan Adegbite, who served under him as Commissioner for works, as minister for Mines and Steel Development, two years ago.

In any Presidential contest, no one competes to be Vice President. It is when they lose out that they are compensated to be Vice President. In reality the Vice Presidency is a consolation prize which diminishes the office.
Since 1999, when we started this democratic experience, we have had only two former Vice-Presidents who have not become President yet. They are Alhaji Abubakar Atiku (75), GCON and Alhaji Namadi Sambo (67), GCON. The Third, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan (64), GCFR, eventually became President on May 5, 2010 following the demise of President Umaru Musa Yar’adua (16 August 1951 – 5 May 2010), GCFR. He too was later elected President in his own right. None of these former Vice Presidents has written memoirs to let us know their experience while serving as Vice President.

In 1999, it was a smooth take off for President Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR and Vice President Atiku Abubakar. No major storm was experienced in their first term in office. In his wisdom President Obasanjo equipped Vice President Atiku with loaded schedules. He first made him the Chairman of National Boundary Commission and posted an experienced Civil Servant, Alhaji D. Bobbo as his Permanent Secretary. President Obasanjo later constituted the National Council For Privatisation and the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE). He made Alhaji Atiku Abubakar the Chairman of the Council. Other members of the council at that time were the Minister of Finance, Alhaji Adamu Ciroma(1934-2018)(Vice Chairman),the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Chief Ufot Ekatte (1939-2019), CFR, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Ajibola James Ige (1930-2001), the Governor of Central, Mr. Joseph Oladele Sanusi (84), from Ogbagi in Akoko, Ondo state, the Minister of Industry, Chief Kolawole Babalola Jamodu (78), the Chief Economic Adviser and Vice Chairman, National Planning Commission, Chief Phillip Chukwuedo Asiodu (88), the Director General of the Bureau of Public Enterprises, Mallam Nasir Ahmad el-Rufai (62) and four others who were appointed from time to time by President Obasanjo. It was the Council that formulated policies and approved the Privitisation Programmes of the Central Government. The Office of the Vice President then was equipped with experienced public officers with the likes of Prince Sola Akanmode, Abdullahi Nyako, Chris Mamah, Abdu Yari Lafiya(DSP), Mahmoud Abdullahi, Sajo Mohammed, Professor Boris Aborisade, Dr. Usman Bugaje, Dr. Hamilton Isu, Tokunbo Adeola, Umar Ardo, Ajuji Ahmed, John Agwu, A.A. Achibong, A. Maigari, O.O. Oyelakin, M.F. Aiyegbusi, Alhaji Ibrahim Abdullahi, G.A. Sobajo, Alhaji I.G. Kura, Dr. A. Ndukwe, Butrous Pembi, and A. Braimoh. President Obasanjo also directed the then Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Chief Ufot Ekaette, CFR, to assign the following portfolios to the Office of the Vice President. They are General Services and Administration, States and Local Government Affairs, Code of Conduct Bureau, National Institute For Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), National Population Commission, Public Complaints Commission and National Planning Commission. Unlike what is playing out now, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar had the privilege and power to nominate ministers, ambassadors, special advisers and other officials from Adamawa state.

In the second term, things fell apart. Only the two men can explain what really happened. I still believe till today, that if Chief Mrs Stella Abebe Obasanjo (1945-2005) had not died in Puerto Banus in Spain on October 23, 2005 and if Otunba Oyewole Fasawe, the ASIWAJU of Owo, who was and is still a close friend of the two men was not incarcerated at that time, the relationship between President Obasanjo and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar could not have degenerated so low, during the second term of President Obasanjo in office.

It is wrong to pretend that the rift between former President Obasanjo and Alhaji Atikiu Abubakar did not affect the smooth running of the government between 2003 and 2007. Of course it did. Careers of many public officers were ruined by the crack. Most have not recovered till today. Some were heartbroken, some even died. It was a difficult period for those close to the two of them. There was the case of Dr Yemi Ogunbiyi, former managing director of The Daily Times, a literature guru and friend of the two men. Unaware of the rift, he flew from Lagos and by mistake first visited Alhaji Atiku Abubakar. He was disallowed from seeing President Obasanjo, in spite of his scheduled appointment. The complete loyalty of the Secretary of the Government of the Federation, Chief Ufot Ekaette and that of the Chief of Staff to the President, Major General Abdullahi Mohammed (81, CFR), saved the central government, inspite of the numerous travels of President Obasanjo at that time. The carryover of the split has affected President Obasanjo and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar and the rest of us till today.

I do not know what the incumbent vice president, Professor Yemi Osinbajo is going through. But talking generally of the office, it is a dead end job. I was in Ikenne, the hometown of Professor Osinbajo in Ogun State recently and I watched regularly the projects sited in Daura on television, the home town of President Buhari, there is a lot of difference. THE POWER OF THE PRESIDENCY has transformed Daura, while there has not been a change in Ikenne in the last six years. Ikenne is not just the hometown of the legendary Chief Obafemi Awolowo (March 6, 1909 – May 9, 1987, GCFR), it is also the headquarters of Ikenne Local Government in Ogun State.

For example in the last six years, the following have been established in Daura – The Federal Polytechnic, Daura; Airforce Reference Hospital, Daura; Women and Children Hospital, Daura; University of Transportation, Daura; Kano-Maradi rail line will pass through Daura; School for People with Special Needs, Daura; Nigeria Airforce Response Air Wing, Daura; Nigeria Army 171 Battalion Base, Daura; and the Forwarding Operating Base, Daura. The National Directorate of Employment Centre, Ganga, Daura; upgrade and expansion of Daura Mini-Stadium; Sustainable Development Goals Skills Acquisition Centre, Zango Road, Daura; Completion of the Sabke Dam, Daura supplies one million litres of water to Daura and neighbouring communities; several SDG School Projects in Daura; 73-kilometre 132KVA line from Katsina to Daura and two 30 and 40 MVA transformers to boost power supply, dualisation of the 72-kilometre Katsina-Daura road; 50-bed maternity centre at the Daura General Hospital built under the name of the First Lady; Sir Emeka Offor E-Library, Daura; 400,000 litres capacity solar powered water system by NNPC; and Belema oil in a joint venture with Jack-Rich Tein Foundation; NDE Cosmetology training and distribution of Cosmetology packs to 1000 women in Daura, 330KV /132KV power substation, Daura, among others.

The 1979 Constitution never gave the Vice President any defined schedule nor the decree No 24 of May 5 1999, which we now know as the 1999 constitution. The only responsibility the Vice President has is in the third schedule of the constitution which makes him the Chairman of the National Economic Council. In that capacity, the council itself is to “advise the President”. In all other bodies, the constitution bestowed on him ordinary membership or in some cases Vice Chairman. He is not a member of the Nigeria Police Council while he is the Vice Chairman of the Council of State, National Defence Council and National Security Council. Section 130 of the Constitution states that there shall be for the federation, a President who shall be the head of state, chief executive of the federation and Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federation. Section 141 states that there shall be for the federation a Vice President. The Constitution never crowned the Vice President as deputy head of State or deputy Chief Executive of the Federation or deputy Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federation. The Constitution is ill to the office of the Vice President yet it coronated the President a King and a god. However cordial they appear to the outside world, there cannot but be conflict between the office of the President and that of the Vice President. It is true that the Decree Number 25 of 1978 which is referred to as the 1979 Constitution was produced by Justice Egbert Udo Udoma (1917-1998) from Ikot Abasi in Akwa Ibom state. It is also true that the Decree Number 24 of 1999 which we refer to as 1999 Constitution was produced by Justice Nikki Tobi (1940-2016). The 1979 Constitution was in fact signed into law by General Olusegun Obasanjo on September 21, 1978 as the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (enactment decree) of 1978. As for Decree Number 24 which we refer to now as 1999 Constitution, it was promulgated and signed into law on May 4, 1999 by General Abdusalam Alhaji Abubakar (GCFR).

One could see that the two Constitutions were engineered and approved by the military. In the structure of the military command, there is no provision for a deputy. In a military context, the chain of command is the line of authority and responsibility along which orders are passed within a military unit and between different units. In more simple terms, the chain of command is the succession of leaders through which command is exercised and executed. And that is why the military transferred all the powers in this country to the Office of the President of Nigeria, who was also named as the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.

The two Constitutions — 1979 and 1999, were not approved by referendum or a plebiscite, unlike in most countries of the world.

The fate of the Vice Presidents is equally similar to the fate of deputy governors. Of all the thirty-six deputy governors elected in 1999, only four of them became governors eventually. They are Dr. Goodluck Jonathan (GCFR), from Bayelsa state, who became governor and later became president, Alhaji Aliyu Mahmud Shinkafi from Zamfara State, Alhaji Umar Abdullahi Ganduje (72) from Kano state and Alhaji Aliyu Mugatakarda Wamako (68) from Sokoto State, who is at present a Senator. There are others who later became senators including Otunba Iyiola Ajani Omisore (64) from Osun state, Chief Chris Stephen Obong Ekpeyong (65) from Akwa Ibom, Chief Enyinnaya Abaribe (65) from Abia State, Mr. Seleh Usman Dambayi (1955-2015) from Taraba and Alhaji Sefiu Adegbenga Kaka (69) from Ogun State.

The rest are today not around politically while some of them have died. They include Bello Tukur (Adamawa), Prince Chinedu Emeka (Anambra), Alhaji A. Mahmoud (Bauchi), O. Ajene (Benue), Alhaji Al A. Jato (Borno), Chief John O. Akpa (Cross Rivers), E. Oko-Isu (Ebonyi), Chief Paul O. Alabi (Ekiti), O. Itanyi (Enugu), Barrister Joshua M. Lidani (Gombe), Engr. Udeagu (Imo), Ibrahim S. Kwatalo (Jigawa), Engr. Stephen R. Shekari (Kaduna), Alhaji T.A. Jikamsi (Katsina), Alhaji A.A. Argungu (Kebbi), Patrick Adaba (Kogi), Deacon (Chief), S.A. Sayami (Kwara), Senator K. Bucknor (Lagos), Onje Gye-Wado (Nassarawa), Barrister Afolabi Iyantan (Ondo), Barrister Iyiola Oladokun (Oyo), Chief Michael Bot-Mbang (Plateau), Sir G.G. Toby (Rivers) and Alhaji A.S. Bagare (Yobe). The one elected in Edo state, Mike Aiyegbemi Oghiadomhe (66) later became Chief of Staff to his friend, President Goodluck Jonathan.

How many of them do we hear of these days? Look at most of them where they are now.

No vice president can survive the systematic demoralization inflicted by the office without serious injury to themselves. The vice presidency is a man eater. The office destroys individuals however competent you could be. The job is a silent killer. Most often vice presidents get to know about activities of government not through briefings, memos and files.
Between the President and vice president, trust, reliance, steadfastness, loyalty, devotion, and fidelity are the key words in their wedlock and I doubt if the two can pass the acid tests. There is always skepticism and dubiety in their marriage. Constant doubt. Their aides too do not help matters.

In 1979, Dr Kingsley Ozumba Mbadiwe (1915-1990), who wanted to be vice president, described the post as a “repeater station of a major network”, while others described it as “the spare tyre on the automobile of government”. No president in the nature of things, is going to yield power to a vice president. Although they were both elected, the vice president is just a part of a package. A sort of an appendage to the presidency. The only reason for keeping the office of Vice President is that it provides an automatic solution to the problem of succession.

In the United States, Bobby Baker, the wheeler-dealer who fell from grace later, remembers Johnson telling him one night: “Bobby, you never had a heart attack. Every night I go to bed, and I never know if I’m going to wake up alive the next morning. I’m just not physically capable of running the Presidency.” Former U.S. Vice President Hubert Humphrey said “there is an old story about the mother who had two sons. One went to sea, and the other became Vice President, and neither was ever heard of again.”

France has abolished the post of Vice President completely and yet the French democracy is one of the strongest in Europe.
On April 2, 1974 French president Georges Pampidou died in office. On May 5, the French had their election followed by a run off on May 19 and the inauguration of Valery Giscard D’estaing on May 27. In short in less than 60 days, France had a new president, freely chosen by the people and equipped by them with a fresh mandate. The results, as told, surely favour France on essential tests of legitimacy and democracy.

Egypt, has no Vice president. Other countries, in fact too numerous to mention, have no vice presidents. In America, where we borrowed most of our constitutional provisions, the constitution of America does say that the Vice President “shall be President of the senate, but shall have no vote, unless they be equally divided.”

When there was objection to this provision in America’s constitutional convention, Roger Sherman observed that if the U.S Vice President did not preside over the senate “he would be without employment”. The Vice President is always in a no-win situation. If he talks, he will be accused of being garrulous and loquacious. If he refuses to talk, he will be labeled dumb and laconic.’ If he works hard, he will be charged of being too’ eager to be president, if he refuses to work, he will be ridiculed for being, indolent, lazy, lacking initiative and lethargic.

In the book, The Imperial Presidency by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., Tom Marshall was quoted as saying “the vice President is like a man in cataleptic state: he cannot speak, he cannot move; he suffers no pain and yet he is perfectly conscious of everything on about him”. Also in the book Hubert Humphrey who was Vice President to Lyndon Johnson described the Vice Presidency in bad terms, “it’s like being naked in the middle of a blizzard with no one to even offer you a match to keep you warm. You are trapped, vulnerable, alone and it does not matter who happens to be President”. To non-politicians, the Presidential election in 2023 is too far but to politicians, it is tomorrow. The scheming for that election is on already. So what do we make of our own Vice President?

The first thing to do is to reform the way Vice-Presidents are chosen. Since 1999, Vice Presidents in Nigeria have been imposed on politics or by hasty compromise of exhausted factional leaders. The selection process must be more open. The party structure must be more involved so that the Vice President nominee could be more screened by the party leaders. Vice Presidents must be given scheduled responsibilities by the constitution same as deputy governors.
The way we choose our Vice Presidents has become so absurd.

In the absence of a constitutional amendment, the best hope for improvement of the Vice President’s job seems to rest in improving the selection process. The presence of top-flight persons as Vice President would at least put some additional pressure on the President to involve the Vice President in important governmental decision making and thus upgrade the existing role of the office.

There is still hope, for the Vice President.

Eric Teniola, a Former Director in Nigeria’s Presidency, Writes From Lagos.

Another sad story from motherland was told early Tuesday with the death of an alumnus of the University of Port Harcourt, Chinelo Megafu Nwando, a young medical doctor, who should be in her late 20s. She was one of the passengers killed by terrorists in the ill-fated Abuja-Kaduna bound train on Monday night.

She wasn’t the only one gunned down by terrorists in that horrific attack, but the desperate call for prayers in her last tweet at about 9.43pm, drew attention to her. Many were not really sure of what to believe – whether the attack was real or fake until she tweeted: “I’m in the train. I have been shot please pray for me.”

I don’t know how many people eventually prayed for her, if any did, the prayers apparently failed to deliver the expected answer, as the news of her death was shared on Tuesday morning by her friend. That was also when we were told that she was billed to travel out of Nigeria this Friday.

She wasn’t the only youth wasted in that incident. Twenty-nine-year-old Farida Sule Mohammed, a lawyer, and daughter of the National Organising Secretary of the Peoples Redemption Party, Mallam Sule Mohammed, was also killed in the Monday night train attack.

Several others, including a director with the National Board for Technical Education (NBTE), Abdu Isa Kofa Mata, and the Secretary-General of the Trade Union Congress (TUC) of Nigeria, Barrister Musa-Lawal Ozigi, were also killed by the terrorists.

Expectedly, Nigerians have been wailing, mourning and condemning the unfortunate incident. Politicians have been competing among themselves on who would write the best ‘wailing’ script, as it were. The Nigerian government also held a minute of silence in honour of the lost souls during its Federal Executive Council meeting on Wednesday. This has always been the pattern. It is our own way of responding to monumental tragedies. In fact, the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Kaduna State chapter, says mourning has become a normal occurrence in the State.

We live in a country where the leadership places zero value on citizens’ lives. Our leaders don’t give a damn in sacrificing the citizenry on the altar of politics. In 2014, Nasir el-Rufai, the same governor of Kaduna State, where mourning has now been described as a daily affair, said terrorism had become an industry in Nigeria, while marketing the present government’s CHANGE agenda. Seven years after, terrorism has moved beyond being an industry to being the government. Terrorists are now in charge.  El-Rufai’s Kaduna seems to be the headquarters of kidnapping and terrorism now. The governor recently withdrew his son from a public school to prevent him from being kidnapped. In the last one week, nearly 100 people have been killed in Giwa Local Government Area (LGA) of the State. Fifteen villagers were reportedly killed when bandits invaded Hayin Kanwa village, Yakawada ward, in Giwa Local Government Area of the State on Sunday. Three days earlier, about 50 people were reportedly killed across nine villages in the same LGA.

All lives matter and no Nigerian, no matter how old, deserves to be wasted as it is currently being witnessed.  The rate at which this country is cutting down the lives of its promising stars is worrisome. We have not only ruined our present, we are destroying our future. I ask myself what should these two young ladies have done for themselves that they hadn’t done? These are young bright stars – a lawyer and a doctor – two of the most competitive courses in our universities.

Imagine the terrorists’ response to the order of Nigeria’s president and commander-in-chief, Muhammadu Buhari, to service chiefs to deal with them ruthlessly – they reportedly ambushed another passenger train along the beleaguered Abuja-Kaduna track, as the train was returning to Abuja from Kaduna. If we think this is one of the fake stories out there, what about the report in the Daily Trust on Wednesday morning that terrorists have again killed another set of 23 people and injured many others in two villages in Giwa Local Government Area of Kaduna State. This is the fourth attack in a row by terrorists within a week in villages across the local government area.

All lives matter and no Nigerian, no matter how old, deserves to be wasted as it is currently being witnessed.  The rate at which this country is cutting down the lives of its promising stars is worrisome. We have not only ruined our present, we are destroying our future. I ask myself what should these two young ladies have done for themselves that they hadn’t done? These are young bright stars – a lawyer and a doctor – two of the most competitive courses in our universities. Aside the huge cost of studying these courses and the tough hurdle that must be crossed to gain admission, the courses place a lot of demands on one’s mental faculty. You have to read volumes of books, combined with lots of practical, etc. To imagine that these young ladies went through all of that only to be killed by some illiterate blood-thirsty beings is unimaginable. Very sad!

I can’t count the number of young Nigerians that I know who have left this country in the last few months.  You can’t blame them. They are tired. It is becoming increasingly frustrating to remain in this country. Unfortunately, our leaders don’t care. They are insensitive. Right now, the only thing that matters to them is who gets what in 2023.

We keep replacing tragedy with tragedy. The painful thing is that most often, the solutions to our problems are too cheap and you just wonder why we are not interested in cheap solutions but keep choosing the expensive alternatives. Take the case of Oluwabamise Ayanwola, the lady killed in a Lagos mass transit bus for example, a simple installation of CCTV cameras could have cautioned drivers and regulated social behaviour in the buses, but that cheap option was jettisoned for an expensive one – the death of a promising Nigerian youth. Never mind that the countries where Lagos imported these buses from have cameras in their own mass transit buses.

Why are we always reluctant in using available technology to solve our problems? For example, we know that satellite images can help in fighting insecurity. That is why countries like the U.S., U.K., and China have many satellites in orbit. But Nigeria has just two satellites.  One of them is on the verge of shutting down due to its expired battery. Meanwhile, we ought to have about 15 to 30 satellites orbiting the earth and performing different functions.

We invested billions of naira in building train tracks and getting locomotives and gave no consideration to the security of the passengers. This is simply because we don’t put people at the centre of our planning. When Bill Gates advised Nigeria to concentrate on building its human resources, some people in government  criticised him. If our government had cared about the people these trains are meant for, they would have spared some money to mount security surveillance along the tracks. Was there any on board radio communications/GPS with control centre or track cameras in the trains?

Well, the minister’s disclosure has further confirmed that people were not at the centre of our planning. The issue of in-built security devices in the trains was an after-thought. Otherwise, those locomotives wouldn’t have commenced operations at all without the security devices in place in the first instance. That is what nations that value human lives do. The president has just ordered the installation of these devices now-after a huge sacrifice of deaths!

Perhaps, things will get better in this country when we all realise that a functional society serves the good of all. Let’s remember that terrorists shut down the Kaduna airport before the attack on the train, so let no one think they are invincible. As Bill Gates rightly noted, Nigeria will thrive when every Nigerian is able to thrive.

Olabisi Deji-Folutile is editor-in-chief, franktalknow.com and member, Nigerian Guild of Editors. Email: bisideji@yahoo.co.uk.

It was a colourful gathering of women, and ‘woke’ men sympathetic to the cause, from different parts of Nigeria, organised under the aegis of the United States Agency for International Development’s Democracy and Governance programme. Although it was unbearably hot that sunny day in November 1998, you could not tell the discomfort the two thousand plus crowd faced, including those who were pregnant, as we marched in unison, propelled by the passion we felt for the messages we held aloft on our placards: “Let Women Lead Too” and “Give Women a Voice in Decision-making.”

We were headed to the Constitution Debate Co-ordinating Committee led by the late Justice Niki Tob,i with the mandate to make a case for affirmative action to enable at least one-third (35 per cent) representation of women in decision-making in our beloved country. The women’s lobby was strong and well-worded, led by erudite professor of Law, late Jadesola Akande, amongst other equally learned representatives.

We were very hopeful. After all, Nigeria was on the threshold of history, about to embrace democratic rule again, with the scheduled 1999 elections, after so many years during which the military passed the baton from one officer to the next via a series of military coups, interspersed with very brief spells of democratic governance. Some of the women who made up the ranks of the rally were going to have the opportunity for the very first time, to elect their own leaders in the 1999 elections. Our hope was palpable; hope in a more democratic process and a more equitable, peaceful, progressive Nigeria.

Fast forward to 2022. It is March – the month in which International Women’s Day is celebrated worldwide – and another group of Nigerian women have gathered in the streets outside the National Assembly. The torment of the gruelling hot sun searing through them was no match for the intense passion knitting them together, as they marched on the streets of Abuja, day after day, holding aloft their placards that said, “Let Women Lead Too” and “Give Women a Voice in the Senate.”

Twenty years after that first women’s march, women are still marching on the same streets, holding the same placards, demanding the same exact thing.

In March 2022, Nigeria’s Senate voted against bills intended to provide a “minimal” number of seats to women to enable them to participate in decision-making in Nigeria – a country that is currently bedevilled by solvable developmental challenges, including how to provide consistent power supply, potable water, gas, petrol, motorable roads, decent public hospitals, transportation and schools, amongst a myriad of other issues.

One of the bills – “to provide for special seats for women in the National and State Houses of Assembly” – if passed, would enable “one additional Senator for each State and the Federal Capital Territory, who shall be a woman.” The current structure already has three senators from each State and one from the Federal Capital Territory. In the House of Assembly, if the bill was passed, it would provide “two additional members for each State and the Federal Capital Territory, who shall be women”, in addition to the already existing “three hundred- and sixty-members…”

There have been protests, outcries and several headlines and reports about the injustice of the whole thing.

What is the worst-case scenario? Is the fear that women would no longer be responsible for domestic chores and child-rearing? Or that they would take control of decision-making in the domestic sphere too? Is the fear that men would be expected to take paternity leave, and put their careers on hold while taking care of their babies?

Would the government pay attention to very important issues that fall on the blind side of policy and intervention, where men predominate (a ratio of seven per cent female to 93 per cent male, as we currently have in the Senate and House of Representatives combined)? Would diversity not enable decision-makers to have a more balanced and progressive view?

Let’s imagine the less petrifying narrative together for a moment. What if women occupied more seats in the Senate? Would it be so bad for the government to pay attention to some issues that affect women, and children (the so-called vulnerable groups), for a change?

Would the government pay attention to very important issues that fall on the blind side of policy and intervention, where men predominate (a ratio of seven per cent female to 93 per cent male, as we currently have in the Senate and House of Representatives combined)? Would diversity not enable decision-makers to have a more balanced and progressive view?

Let’s consider this seriously:

Would Nigeria relinquish her shameful position as one of the countries with the highest maternal mortality rates in our 21st-century world? (Reports indicate that one in 22 Nigerian women die in the process of childbearing. This makes Nigeria home to 20 per cent of all maternal deaths in the world!).

Would women-owned businesses produce more wealth for the country because they are not hindered by land ownership/inheritance/cultural challenges, among others?

Would we have fewer out-of-school children (especially girls), fewer child brides and unemployed young people?

Would women who need to use public toilets more frequently and are not wired to pee on the streets and highways be given consideration in urban planning?

Would corruption, the bane of development and growth, be more rigorously tackled?

…I am not saying that accepting a minimum number of female candidates into this revered, big boys’ club, sorry assembly, would solve all of Nigeria’s problems, but shouldn’t we at least have the benefit of alternative voices, male and female?  

In the debilitating heatwave that the country is currently experiencing, would we have electricity supply that lasts even up to two days at a stretch, to keep hospitals and other life-saving services and businesses running, even if not to fan the hot air circulating in our homes without public pipe-borne water?

Would we be assured that when young people exercise their right to peaceful protest over the violation of their rights, they would not be gunned down with our national flag draped around their shoulders?

Just food for thought.

PS: Apparently, due to the protests by women’s groups and other concerned parties, the House announced the decision to rescind three out of the five gender-related bills that were rejected. The two bills, not on the table for reconsideration, are those offering affirmative action, in terms of women accessing 35 per cent of positions in political parties and in appointive positions at the state and federal levels.

Frankly, I would consider the passage of these bills justice in action, which needs no further queries, given that male citizens already have been enjoying these rights without debate.

Listen, I am not saying that accepting a minimum number of female candidates into this revered, big boys’ club, sorry assembly, would solve all of Nigeria’s problems, but shouldn’t we at least have the benefit of alternative voices, male and female?

After all, as they say, what is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Arit Oku, a gender and development specialist, writes from Lagos.