Home Blog Page 41

Reshaping Africa’s Mineral Future Through Value Addition, By Martha Agas (NAN)

0

Africa holds about 30 per cent of the world’s mineral resources.
However, most of these are exported in raw form, earning the continent only a small share of their eventual market value.

Analysts say this pattern has created a structural imbalance, where African countries end up re-importing high-value finished products made from their own raw materials at higher costs.

For example, Zambia exports nearly 80 per cent of its copper in unprocessed form, only to import copper-based goods such as cables and electrical equipment.

Similarly, Guinea holds some of the world’s largest reserves of bauxite, used in aluminium production, but undertakes very little local refining, resulting in a continued reliance on imported aluminium products.

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which supplies more than 70 per cent of the global cobalt used in lithium-ion batteries, also exports mainly raw or semi-processed cobalt hydroxide.

Consequently, it captures only a fraction of the total value chain, while importing expensive battery components and electronics.

In Nigeria, the trend is no different.

According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), in 2023, more than 90 per cent of the country’s export value came from unprocessed mineral products, mostly ores and concentrates exported in raw form.

Similarly, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) estimates that Africa’s exports of intermediate goods (excluding fuels) were worth 312 billion dollars in 2022.

These exports, which include ores, precious stones, and agricultural commodities, continue to supply global industries but contribute little to local industrialisation.

Stakeholders argue that this persistent outflow of raw materials, especially crucial minerals, sustains industries abroad while depriving African nations of opportunities for value addition, job creation, and inclusive development.

In spite of this wealth, Africa continues to rank low on global development indices.

The latest UN Human Development Report 2023/24 shows that more than half of the world’s 20 lowest-ranked countries are in Africa.

In Sub-Saharan Africa, approximately 37 per cent of the population lives on less than 2.15 dollars per day.

Experts contend that this trend must be reversed if Africa is to fully harness its mineral wealth for development.

With the region holding many of the world’s critical minerals needed for the global energy transition, the timing for reform is urgent.

They advocate a shift from raw material exports to the production of high-value finished goods.

Such a strategy, they note, would not only boost export earnings but also meet local development needs, including access to clean energy, job creation, and improved infrastructure.

Prof. Shekwonyadu Iyakwari, an expert in Applied Mineralogy and Exploration Geology at the Federal University of Lafia, revealed another concern.

He noted that many ore deposits in Nigeria contain multiple valuable minerals, yet companies often declare only one or two for export.

“When companies start processing here, we will see that what we allow them to export is beyond what is declared. Processing locally will go a long way in helping our economy,” he said.

Meanwhile, civil society organisations continue to warn that this pattern of external dependency, what they call a ‘mineral heist’ will persist unless unfair trade structures, weak governance, and limited local value addition are urgently addressed.

To change this narrative, several African countries are taking steps to retain more value from their resources.

Many governments are now revisiting old mining agreements and renegotiating terms to ensure fairer conditions, greater local content, and increased domestic processing.

For instance, Zambia and the DRC have come under growing pressure to review contracts with foreign mining firms.

Both countries are currently exploring joint initiatives to establish local battery manufacturing plants, aiming to capture more value from their copper and cobalt resources (Bloomberg Africa Mining Report, 2023).

In Nigeria, the Federal Government introduced a value addition policy in 2024 under the administration of President Bola Tinubu.

The policy requires mining companies to submit clear plans for local processing before they can obtain operating licences (Federal Ministry of Solid Minerals).

The Minister of Solid Minerals, Mr Dele Alake, has also championed regional cooperation.

On January 9, 2024, during the third Future Minerals Forum in Riyadh, he unveiled the Africa Minerals Strategy Group (AMSG) with 16 African countries as founding members.

According to Alake, the AMSG seeks to empower African nations to collectively shape policies and fully benefit from their mineral wealth through harmonised strategies and cooperation.

This momentum continued at the fourth edition of the African Natural Resources and Energy Investment Summit (AFNIS), held from July 15 to 17, under the theme: ‘Harnessing Local Content for Sustainable Development’.

The summit focused on shifting Africa’s mineral development model, from exporting raw materials to building local industries, refining minerals, generating energy, and creating jobs.

In its communiqué, participants resolved to prioritise local content and build strong domestic value chains, especially in mineral processing and industrialisation.

“AFNIS 2025 served as a vital platform for African nations and the private sector to reinforce their commitment to the inclusive, sustainable, and value-driven development of their natural resources and energy sectors.

“This is to ensure that the continent’s immense wealth benefits its people,” the communique read.

Delegates also agreed to mobilise domestic capital to fund strategic projects through a new initiative known as the ‘Africans for Africa’ fund.

This is expected to strengthen African ownership of natural resources and reduce reliance on foreign exploration firms.

The summit explored ways to better harness local resources, from minerals and renewable energy to skilled human capital to drive sustainable economic growth.

Discussions also focused on accelerating access to renewable energy, closing the energy access gap, and expanding partnerships and investment in the green economy.

In addition, African mining ministers and CEOs of leading mining companies pledged to expand regional mineral testing infrastructure and proposed the creation of joint industrial corridors and shared processing facilities.

These are expected to scale up local beneficiation and reduce export dependency.

Experts believe that if current value addition efforts across Africa are sustained, more companies will be established to manufacture finished goods from the continent’s vast natural resources.

Thus, unlocking a new era of industrial growth and inclusive development. (NANFeatures)

Martha Agas is of the News Agency of Nigeria

Nigeria: Capital Market Key to Sustainable Mining — Alake

0

By Martha Agas

The Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dr Dele Alake, says the capital market is a critical pillar in Nigeria’s drive toward a sustainable mining sector.

Alake made the remark at a webinar on unlocking Nigeria’s solid minerals potential through the capital market on Wednesday.

The event was organised by the Solid Minerals Development Fund (SMDF) and the National Association of Securities Dealers Over-the-Counter (NASD OTC) Securities Exchange.

Represented by his Senior Adviser on Mining and Policy, Mrs Amira Waziri, the minister said that improved funding was needed to reposition the solid minerals sector and increase its contribution to the country’s GDP.

“Through the capital market, we can mobilise long-term financing for exploration and project development, support junior mining companies to list, raise funds and scale operations;

“We can also facilitate securitisation and monetisation of geological assets and channel institutional capital into infrastructure and processing hubs,“ he said.

Alake expressed confidence that the webinar marked the beginning of a broader national conversation on using structured capital to unlock mineral wealth.

He said that the ministry would work with the SMDF and other stakeholders to develop custom-made instruments, listings and frameworks to translate this vision into reality.

According to him, the ministry remains committed to inclusive and strategic stakeholder engagement and are open to ideas, partnerships and joint efforts that advance the collective good of the mining industry.

“This includes continuous dialogue with host communities to ensure local participation and benefits, as well as stronger collaboration with financial institutions, ” he said.

Alake said that other areas included working with Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) and capital market operators, and aligning with environmental and social best practices to ensure sustainability.

The Executive Secretary (ES) of the SMDF, Hajiya Fatima Shinkafi, said that realising the potential of Nigeria’s solid minerals sector would require innovative financing approaches aligned with government priorities and private sector needs.

Represented by her Technical Adviser, Abdulmajeed Amussah, Shinkafi said that the SMDF had deployed three funding vehicles.

She listed the vehicles as the Growth Fund, Opportunities Fund and Research Fund,  to unlock the untapped potential in the solid minerals sector.

She said that the Growth Fund supported early-stage exploration and project development, while the Opportunities Fund focused on advancing mature mining projects and strengthening infrastructure readiness.

“The Research Fund supports enabling policies, geological data, and ecosystem innovation.

“Many projects in Nigeria remain stuck at the first and second stages of exploration and feasibility studies, which reduces their attractiveness to potential financiers.

“Despite over N10 billion being available for mining development, credit distribution remains skewed, with agriculture and transportation getting the bulk of bank financing, and mining barely making a dent,“ she said.

The Chief Executive Officer of NASD OTC, Mr Eguarekhide Longe, said that unveiling a bold capital market to unlock Nigeria’s solid minerals wealth involved leveraging the capital market to mobilise strategic investment into the sector.

Longe said that this could be achieved through the National Digital Securities Platform (N-DSP), a blockchain-based platform for listing, trading, clearing and settlement of tokenised securities.

“Through tokenised instruments like debt, equity, and mineral-backed securities, we can channel investment into exploration, production, and processing, while making capital market participation more accessible and transparent, “ he said.

He said that the initiative aligned with the Federal Government’s drive for value addition, industrialisation and a shift from exporting raw ore to in-country beneficiation.

Report Uncovers Lack of Inclusivity, Legal Compliance in Political Parties

0

By Justina Auta

The Political Parties Performance Index (PPPI) report has revealed lack of inclusivity, legal compliance and public outreach in Nigeria’s 19 registered political parties.
This was disclosed at the launch of the PPPI report and the Inter Party Advisory Council (IPAC) constitution on Wednesday in Abuja.

The PPPI is an evidence-based framework developed by Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD) to assess political parties performance in the areas of inclusivity, legal compliance, and public outreach.

Adebowale Olorunmola, Country Director of WFD, Nigeria, said that the data revealed gaps between how well parties think they are doing, how their members perceive their performance, and how the public experiences them.

Olorummola said that parties reported an average score of 82.4 per cent on inclusivity, while party members rated this at just 67.6 per cent, exposing a 15 per cent implementation gap.

“In legal compliance gap, While parties self-reported 86.4 per cent, members gave an average of 72.4 per cent.

“Citizens rated political parties at just 45.9 per cent for public outreach, which is the lowest score across all assessment layers” he said.

According to him, the launch of the PPPI report and adoption of the revised IPAC constitution will strengthen democracy and commitment by political parties to embrace accountability, inclusion, and institutional reform.

”We believe that strong, transparent and citizen-responsive political parties are the cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

“These tools are not just documents; they are instruments of transformation that can help political parties better serve the Nigerian people,” he said.

He said that the documents would contribute to building a more resilient and inclusive democratic system.

Alhaji Yusuf Dantalle, National Chairman, IPAC, said that the constitution now served as a new ethical standard that all registered political parties must uphold as a platform that produced elected office holders across the country.

”We are duty bound to champion good governance accountability and service delivery.

“We must hold leaders to their promises and keep the welfare of the people above personal interest in line with section 14, sub section two, paragraph B of the 1999 constitution,” Dantalle said.

Prof. Kunle Ajayi, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) National Commissioner, said that the problem was with parties not complying with their own constitution.

“So this framework is to ensure that they drive their own internal constitution to enforce it on them to avoid crisis and loosing credibility in the eyes of the public.

”Parties have to reach out to the public.
They have to be active, not only during election time, but before, during and after election, they have to be visible,” he said.

Mr Kingsley Chinda, Minority Leader, House of Representatives, noted lack of political discipline, ideology and vision as challenges affecting political parties.

Chinda described the PPPI report as a developmental framework designed to nudge parties toward transparency, accountability and better engagement.

“There is an urgent need for a national conversation on political party reform.

“This conversation must be anchored, not only on the deficiencies we see today, but on the possibilities we can imagine,” he said. (NAN)

A Square Peg in a Square Hole: Kaduna Gets New Commissioner Of Information

0

Governor Uba Sani of Kaduna state, North West Nigeria, has appointed the Managing Director, Kaduna State Media Corporation, (KSMC) Alhaji Ahmed Maiyaki,  as the new Commissioner of Information.

This came after the Governor relieved Professor Muhammad Sani Bello, a financial expert, of his position as Commissioner of Information and a member of the State Executive Council.
A statement issued by the Chief Press Secretary to the governor, Malam Ibraheem Musa Tuesday July 29, 2025 has said.
According to the statement, the governor has relieved Professor Muhammad Sani Bello of his position as Commissioner of Information and a member of the State Executive Council.
The statement which acknowledged the contributions of Professor Muhammad Sani Bello, wished him success in his new endeavour.
Professor Sani Bello was the pioneer Commissioner of Education in the Governor Uba Sani Administration before becoming  Commissioner of Information

Kogi Community Sends SOS TO Gov. Ododo Over Suspected Herder’s Attacks, 50, 000 Residents Displaced, Houses Razed

0

By Comrade Husseini A.Aloko
Oganenigu communities in Dekina local government area of Kogi State have been plagued by a relentless cycle of attacks from suspected herdsmen. This has left over 50,000 residents displaced, rendering them homeless and seeking refuge in neighbouring villages hence the urgent  government intervention.

The recent attack on Saturday, July 26th, 2025, was particularly devastating as scores of houses were burned down and properties worth millions of Naira destroyed.

The situation in Oganenigu is dire, with the people facing not only the trauma of displacement but also the threat of hunger as they are unable to access their farms and livelihoods.

Dr. A. P. Onuh, the Executive Chairman of Oganenigu Youth for Peace and Development Foundation, has appealed to the state government for immediate intervention.
Dr Onuh said, It is heart-wrenching to see the residents of Oganenigu, who were once a thriving and peaceful community, now reduced to Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in their own land. That the  constant fear of attacks has left the community in a state of distress, hindering farming and other commercial activities, we urgently need the government’s assistance to restore peace and normalcy.

As our  community reels from this tragedy, we  look to His Excellency, Governor Usman Ododo, for support. We urge the governor to mobilize security operatives into the area to restore peace and prevent further bloodshed.
It is also  crucial for the government to constitute a high-power fact-finding committee to investigate the incessant attacks and find a lasting solution to the herdsmen’s aggression in the community.
Additionally, we also  call on the state government to direct emergency response teams to provide relief efforts to the community IDPs. These immediate interventions will bring much-needed relief to the affected residents and help them rebuild their lives.
The people of Oganenigu have been crying out for help, and it is time for the government to take swift and decisive action. We implore Governor Ododo to act swiftly and decisively to ensure the safety and security of his people. Let us not forget that the ultimate goal is for Kogi State to succeed, and for Oganenigu to be safe and peaceful once again.

In conclusion, we appeal to the government to hear the cries of the Oganenigu communities and take proactive measures to put an end to the incessant herders’ attacks.

The time to act is now, and we hope that Kogi State will emerge stronger and more united from this tragedy. Let us work together to build a safer and more secure future for all our communities in Kogi State.

Middle Belt Forum Opposes Establishment Of National Council For Traditional Rulers’ Bill Over Contentious Clause

0

PRESS STATEMENT
The Position of the Middle Belt Forum on the Proposed Legislation Making the Sultan of Sokoto, Permanent Co-chairmen of National Council for Traditional Rulers of Nigeria

The Middle Belt Forum (MBF) wishes to categorically express its firm opposition to a contentious clause in the National Council for Traditional Rulers of Nigeria (Establishment) Bill, 2024, currently before the National Assembly. The Bill, sponsored by Senator Simon Bako Lalong (Plateau South), who is respected son of the Middle Belt and the Gwad-Goemai of the Goemai ethnic nation, has passed its second reading as of March 2025 and is now under consideration by the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service.

At the heart of the controversy lies a deeply troubling clause in the Bill which proposes that the Sultan of Sokoto and the Ooni of Ife be made permanent co-chairmen of the proposed National Council for Traditional Rulers.

While we leave our esteemed partners from the Southern region, to determine their position on the inclusion of the Ooni of Ife, the Middle Belt Forum unequivocally rejects, abhors, and condemns the institutionalisation of the Sultan of Sokoto as a permanent co-chairman of this proposed council.

This rejection is anchored on strong historical, cultural, constitutional, and moral grounds, which we now outline in clear terms:

1. The Sokoto Sultanate is Historically Junior to Middle Belt Monarchies

Historically, the Sokoto Caliphate is a relatively young institution compared to ancient kingdoms and confederacies in the Middle Belt. For instance, the Kwararafa Confederacy, which flourished for centuries, predates the Caliphate.
It is a historically documented fact that the confederate state of Kwarafa existed right back to circa 800s-1700s A.D. The Aku Uka of Wukari, its current spiritual heir, represents a legacy that predates Sokoto Caliphate’s very existence. The Sultan of Sokoto can therefore not supersede the Aku Uka of Wukari in status and prestige to seat over him as Chairman of the Traditional Council created by law.

2. The Attah of Igala Ranks Higher in Historical and Traditional Status
The Attah of Igala, whose kingdom flourished well before and after the 14th century, occupies a higher pedestal in terms of history, cultural roots, and legitimacy. The Igala Kingdom never came under the caliphate’s domain and continues to represent deep-rooted indigenous authority far older and more authentically Nigerian than the Sokoto Sultanate.

3. The Tor Tiv Represents a Powerful, Independent Cultural Identity
The Tiv Nation, one of the largest ethnolinguistic groups in Nigeria, was never conquered by the Sokoto Caliphate. The Tor Tiv stands as the supreme symbol of a proud, resilient people who were acephalous and thrived independently before colonial rule. To ask that the Tor Tiv permanently defer to the Sultan in council matters is a gross distortion of historical facts and a violation of indigenous dignity.

4. The Nupe Kingdom Preceded the Sokoto Caliphate
The Nupe Kingdom, with a proud lineage dating back to the 15th century, has its own deep-rooted traditional structures. Even though Fulani jihadists eventually imposed Islamic rule in Nupe land post-1835, the Etsu Nupe today still represents an enduring cultural institution that predates the Caliphate. In no logical or historical context can the Caliphate claim seniority or supremacy over Nupe tradition.

5. Sultan is Primarily a Religious Leader, Not a Secular Traditional Monarch
In Nigeria today, the Sultan of Sokoto is widely acknowledged as the spiritual head of all Nigerian Muslims, particularly across the 19 Northern States and the FCT. His spiritual leadership role is fundamentally religious. It is not secular. Therefore, his institutionalised leadership over a national council of traditional rulers would alienate Christians, traditional worshippers, and other faiths, violating the secular spirit of Nigeria’s Constitution. It would also skew the balance of representation in favour of Islam, thereby promoting religious supremacy under the guise of traditional unity.

6 Kanem Borno Historical/Islamic Legacy Outranks Sokoto Caliphate
Though the Kanuri people are not part of the Middle Belt, the truth must however be told: the Shehu of Borno ranks higher than the Sultan of Sokoto in historical standing. Kanem-Borno embraced Islam as early as the 11th century (circa 1085 AD), long before the 1804 Sokoto Jihad, which never conquered Borno. It is therefore left for the Kanuri people to state their position on this matter.

7. The Sultan’s Patronage of MACBAN and the Fulani Crisis
It is on public record that the Sultan of Sokoto is the permanent patron of Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association (MACBAN), an organisation whose name has become closely linked with violent Fulani herdsmen, who are responsible for thousands of deaths and the displacement of millions, especially in the Middle Belt. The Sultan has not done enough to condemn or dissociate himself from these atrocities. Making him a permanent co-chairman under such circumstances is a grievous insult to the thousands of victims who continue to suffer under Fulani militia attacks.

8. The Middle Belt Cannot Continue to Defer to the Sokoto Sultanate
Sixty-five years after Nigeria’s independence, the Middle Belt can no longer accept a subordinate position to the Sultanate of Sokoto or any traditional institution that does not reflect our history, culture, or aspirations.
Historically, the diverse ethnic nationalities of the Middle Belt resisted the incursions of Usman Dan Fodio’s jihadists. While Hausaland fell under the control of Dan Fodio’s forces in the early 1800s, the Middle Belt remained largely unconquered, preserving its distinct identity and sovereignty.
The imposition of the indirect rule system by the British colonial administration altered this dynamic. By forcefully placing our autonomous communities under the control of Emirate systems—most notably the Sokoto Caliphate—the colonial authorities created an artificial hierarchy that granted undue privilege and influence to Fulani-dominated Emirates over the indigenous peoples of the Middle Belt and beyond.
More than six decades after the end of colonial rule, it is unacceptable for any traditional authority to be elevated above others, particularly in a democratic Nigeria that champions equality, justice, and federal character.

*Our Position*

In light of the above, the Middle Belt Forum hereby states emphatically that:

i) If the Senate passes this bill with the contentious clause and it is assented to by the President, we will mobilise all ethnic nationalities across the Middle Belt to boycott participation in the Council.

ii) Traditional rulers of the Middle Belt will neither recognise nor attend meetings of a Council whose leadership is permanently skewed in favour of a non-indigenous, religiously aligned and a lesser monarch  status to our traditional rulers.

iii) We shall, in accordance with constitutional liberties, form our own autonomous Council of Middle Belt Traditional Rulers, which shall reflect the historical, cultural, and moral values of our people.

The Path Forward:

To preserve national unity, equity, and fairness, we propose the following:

(a) The Chairmanship of the Council should be rotational. It should cut across all geo-political zones or ethnic blocs

(b) It should also be tenure-based in a manner that  gives all traditional rulers and their peoples a sense of belonging and dignity.

(c) Another alternative is for traditional rulers themselves to democratically choose their chairperson(s) through a transparent, inclusive process that reflects Nigeria’s pluralism.

(d) Such a Council must reflect the values of equality, justice, and historical truth.

Conclusion.

The Middle Belt Forum stands firm in its belief that true national cohesion can only be achieved through fairness, mutual respect, and recognition of our rich historical diversities.

Any attempt to impose a permanent religious figurehead on a national institution of traditional rulers is a violation of Nigeria’s secular character, cultural heritage, and federal structure. We shall resist it using every lawful and democratic means available to us.

Signed:
Luka Binniyat

National Spokesman,
Middle Belt Forum (MBF)
27th July 2025
  Abuja, Nigeria

Establishment Of National Council For Traditional Rulers Bill, Middle Belt Opposes Contentious Clause

0

PRESS STATEMENT
The Position of the Middle Belt Forum on the Proposed Legislation Making the Sultan of Sokoto, Permanent Co-chairmen of National Council for Traditional Rulers of Nigeria

The Middle Belt Forum (MBF) wishes to categorically express its firm opposition to a contentious clause in the National Council for Traditional Rulers of Nigeria (Establishment) Bill, 2024, currently before the National Assembly. The Bill, sponsored by Senator Simon Bako Lalong (Plateau South), who is respected son of the Middle Belt and the Gwad-Goemai of the Goemai ethnic nation, has passed its second reading as of March 2025 and is now under consideration by the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service.

At the heart of the controversy lies a deeply troubling clause in the Bill which proposes that the Sultan of Sokoto and the Ooni of Ife be made permanent co-chairmen of the proposed National Council for Traditional Rulers.

While we leave our esteemed partners from the Southern region, to determine their position on the inclusion of the Ooni of Ife, the Middle Belt Forum unequivocally rejects, abhors, and condemns the institutionalisation of the Sultan of Sokoto as a permanent co-chairman of this proposed council.

This rejection is anchored on strong historical, cultural, constitutional, and moral grounds, which we now outline in clear terms:

1. The Sokoto Sultanate is Historically Junior to Middle Belt Monarchies

Historically, the Sokoto Caliphate is a relatively young institution compared to ancient kingdoms and confederacies in the Middle Belt. For instance, the Kwararafa Confederacy, which flourished for centuries, predates the Caliphate.
It is a historically documented fact that the confederate state of Kwarafa existed right back to circa 800s-1700s A.D. The Aku Uka of Wukari, its current spiritual heir, represents a legacy that predates Sokoto Caliphate’s very existence. The Sultan of Sokoto can therefore not supersede the Aku Uka of Wukari in status and prestige to seat over him as Chairman of the Traditional Council created by law.

2. The Attah of Igala Ranks Higher in Historical and Traditional Status
The Attah of Igala, whose kingdom flourished well before and after the 14th century, occupies a higher pedestal in terms of history, cultural roots, and legitimacy. The Igala Kingdom never came under the caliphate’s domain and continues to represent deep-rooted indigenous authority far older and more authentically Nigerian than the Sokoto Sultanate.

3. The Tor Tiv Represents a Powerful, Independent Cultural Identity
The Tiv Nation, one of the largest ethnolinguistic groups in Nigeria, was never conquered by the Sokoto Caliphate. The Tor Tiv stands as the supreme symbol of a proud, resilient people who were acephalous and thrived independently before colonial rule. To ask that the Tor Tiv permanently defer to the Sultan in council matters is a gross distortion of historical facts and a violation of indigenous dignity.

4. The Nupe Kingdom Preceded the Sokoto Caliphate
The Nupe Kingdom, with a proud lineage dating back to the 15th century, has its own deep-rooted traditional structures. Even though Fulani jihadists eventually imposed Islamic rule in Nupe land post-1835, the Etsu Nupe today still represents an enduring cultural institution that predates the Caliphate. In no logical or historical context can the Caliphate claim seniority or supremacy over Nupe tradition.

5. Sultan is Primarily a Religious Leader, Not a Secular Traditional Monarch
In Nigeria today, the Sultan of Sokoto is widely acknowledged as the spiritual head of all Nigerian Muslims, particularly across the 19 Northern States and the FCT. His spiritual leadership role is fundamentally religious. It is not secular. Therefore, his institutionalised leadership over a national council of traditional rulers would alienate Christians, traditional worshippers, and other faiths, violating the secular spirit of Nigeria’s Constitution. It would also skew the balance of representation in favour of Islam, thereby promoting religious supremacy under the guise of traditional unity.

6 Kanem Borno Historical/Islamic Legacy Outranks Sokoto Caliphate
Though the Kanuri people are not part of the Middle Belt, the truth must however be told: the Shehu of Borno ranks higher than the Sultan of Sokoto in historical standing. Kanem-Borno embraced Islam as early as the 11th century (circa 1085 AD), long before the 1804 Sokoto Jihad, which never conquered Borno. It is therefore left for the Kanuri people to state their position on this matter.

7. The Sultan’s Patronage of MACBAN and the Fulani Crisis
It is on public record that the Sultan of Sokoto is the permanent patron of Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association (MACBAN), an organisation whose name has become closely linked with violent Fulani herdsmen, who are responsible for thousands of deaths and the displacement of millions, especially in the Middle Belt. The Sultan has not done enough to condemn or dissociate himself from these atrocities. Making him a permanent co-chairman under such circumstances is a grievous insult to the thousands of victims who continue to suffer under Fulani militia attacks.

8. The Middle Belt Cannot Continue to Defer to the Sokoto Sultanate
Sixty-five years after Nigeria’s independence, the Middle Belt can no longer accept a subordinate position to the Sultanate of Sokoto or any traditional institution that does not reflect our history, culture, or aspirations.
Historically, the diverse ethnic nationalities of the Middle Belt resisted the incursions of Usman Dan Fodio’s jihadists. While Hausaland fell under the control of Dan Fodio’s forces in the early 1800s, the Middle Belt remained largely unconquered, preserving its distinct identity and sovereignty.
The imposition of the indirect rule system by the British colonial administration altered this dynamic. By forcefully placing our autonomous communities under the control of Emirate systems—most notably the Sokoto Caliphate—the colonial authorities created an artificial hierarchy that granted undue privilege and influence to Fulani-dominated Emirates over the indigenous peoples of the Middle Belt and beyond.
More than six decades after the end of colonial rule, it is unacceptable for any traditional authority to be elevated above others, particularly in a democratic Nigeria that champions equality, justice, and federal character.

*Our Position*

In light of the above, the Middle Belt Forum hereby states emphatically that:

i) If the Senate passes this bill with the contentious clause and it is assented to by the President, we will mobilise all ethnic nationalities across the Middle Belt to boycott participation in the Council.

ii) Traditional rulers of the Middle Belt will neither recognise nor attend meetings of a Council whose leadership is permanently skewed in favour of a non-indigenous, religiously aligned and a lesser monarch  status to our traditional rulers.

iii) We shall, in accordance with constitutional liberties, form our own autonomous Council of Middle Belt Traditional Rulers, which shall reflect the historical, cultural, and moral values of our people.

The Path Forward:

To preserve national unity, equity, and fairness, we propose the following:

(a) The Chairmanship of the Council should be rotational. It should cut across all geo-political zones or ethnic blocs

(b) It should also be tenure-based in a manner that  gives all traditional rulers and their peoples a sense of belonging and dignity.

(c) Another alternative is for traditional rulers themselves to democratically choose their chairperson(s) through a transparent, inclusive process that reflects Nigeria’s pluralism.

(d) Such a Council must reflect the values of equality, justice, and historical truth.

Conclusion.

The Middle Belt Forum stands firm in its belief that true national cohesion can only be achieved through fairness, mutual respect, and recognition of our rich historical diversities.

Any attempt to impose a permanent religious figurehead on a national institution of traditional rulers is a violation of Nigeria’s secular character, cultural heritage, and federal structure. We shall resist it using every lawful and democratic means available to us.

Signed:
Luka Binniyat

National Spokesman,
Middle Belt Forum (MBF)
27th July 2025
  Abuja, Nigeria

Circulation Of Fake Cables, Electrical Wires In Nigerian Market Worries Distributors, Alert Regulatory Agencies

0

Distributors of cable electrical wires in Nigeria have raised alarm over the proliferation of fake wires in the markets with attendance consequences, such as electrical hazards and the nation’s economy.

They argued that the issue comes with negative implications as it  discouraged investment in local manufacturing and increase the risk of fires and other electrical hazards, leading to further economic losses.

They asserted these during the 2025 Customers’ Forum meeting organised by the Northern Cables Processing and Manufacturing Company (NOCACO) in Kaduna at the weekend.

Fake and substandard electrical cables, they further emphasized, significantly harm Nigeria’s economy by incrbeasing maintenance costs, causing system downtime, leading to liability issues, and damaging the reputations of electricians and contractors.

Speaking on behalf of the distributors at the meeting, Chief Anthony Abiakam and Mr. Sunday Micheal urged the government and other relevants agencies to rise to the occasion and strictly address the issue of fake cables and wires in circulation in the Nigerian market.

In his remarks, the Managing Director and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of NOCACO, Dr. Tunde Orija, explained that the meeting was to get feedback from the distributors who are directly dealing with the public on how the industry is supporting the economic growth of the country.

While fielding questions from the newsmen during the meeting, Orija disclosed that in the last one year, the company has maintained a stable price of its products despite the fluctuation in the price of dollars.

Orija, while proffering solutions to the issue of fake electrical cable wires in the country, he said that government must improve on its enforcement, while the relevant regulatory agencies must also ensure that only certified products are allowed into the market

” Today’s meeting is part of our effort as a company to create awareness on our own role in the fight against proliferation of fake cables and wires in the Nigerian markets. This is to let people to know that there are fake products of cables and wires in the market, which are not good for the economy of the country and the safety of the people. It is an environmental and sustainability issues that must be confronted.

” All the stakeholders, we must have collaborative effort to fight the evil of fake product of cables and wires in the markets,” Orija emphasized.

While appreciating the company, the distributors acknowledged the standard and the stability in the prices of its products, though, they  asked for reduction in the products’ prices and to also maintain the high standard.

.

Currency Exchange Rates

USD - United States Dollar
ZAR
0.06
EUR
1.17
CAD
0.73
ILS
0.31
INR
0.01
GBP
1.34
CNY
0.14
Enable Notifications OK No thanks