Home Blog Page 39

Itasa Community Protest: Mining Coy Says Demands Unrealistic

4

 

By Martha Agas

A mining company, Architype Industries Nigeria Ltd. has described the demands of the Itasa community in Iwajowa Local Government Area of Oyo State, as unrealistic and outside the scope of its Community Development Agreement (CDA).

The Managing Director of the company, Adeniran Ajibade, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Sunday in Abuja that the company was not opposed to a review of its CDA as requested by the community.

Ajibade

NAN recalls that leaders and youths of Itasa staged a protest in March over the alleged exploration and exploitation of its natural resources by Architype Industries Nigeria Ltd.

They accused the mining company of breaching the CDA that provided for adequate compensation and environmental rehabilitation, and called for government intervention to address the situation.

Reacting to the allegation, Ajibade said that the community, through its counsel, Femi Aborisade, produced a draft for the review of its CDA, demanding a 30 per cent share of the minerals from the company, among others, which he declined to sign.

“Aborisade said that the company’s operations will remain illegal if the demands are not met.

“Many of the covenants in that particular draft CDA were not in compliance with extant laws, and did not follow the procedures of CDA as launched by the Ministry of Solid Minerals Development.”

He decried the provision where the counsel asked that the community would be sharing 30 per cent of minerals with the company.

“They also mandated that the company would have to tar 70km of roads, all the road network in the town and link the town with surrounding communities.

“They talked about a lot of infrastructural development in terms of looking at the community health centre, palace, town hall and ultra-modern shopping mall,” he said.

According to Ajibade, during a recent meeting with the community facilitated by the Mines Department in Ibadan, the community was informed that its demands were unrealistic and illegal.

“I think the demands are actually grandstanding.

“The counsel wants to introduce four projects to the CDA and wants to stop the business that will generate the resources to implement the projects,” he said.

Ajibade said that although the company had been present in the community for about 25 years, actual mining began only recently, as they had spent years on exploration until their recent breakthrough in discovering lithium ore.

“It is not at this point that they will now be thinking of replacing us with foreigners,” he said.

The managing director said that in a fortnight the company would meet with the community in the Mines Office to resolve all the contention in the draft CDA.

He said that the meeting would be followed by a marathon negotiation in the interest of both parties.

“We agreed that it is in our interest to come together so that we can have peaceful possession of our site,” Ajibade said.

Kaduna By-Election: Be Fair To All Political Parties, ADC Chieftain, Abosede Tells INEC

0

. . . Urges Security Agencies To Be Neutral

A Chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC),  Mrs Abosede Rahila Adamu, has called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to allow the forthcoming by-elections in Kaduna state to be free, fair and credible.

She urged the electoral umpire to allow the end results of the by-elections to reflect the will of the people of Kaduna state, adding that INEC should ensure that the rights of  every stakeholder are protected and not that of the few in government.

Rahila Adamu stated this in a statement issued and released to the media on Sunday in Kaduna
According to the Chieftain, INEC assurance towards conducting credible elections into Chikun/Kajuru and Zaria Kewaye/Zaria Sabon Gari Federal Constituencies should go beyond a lip service that has always been the practice over the years

She said, globally, people are interested in the conduct and the outcome of the by-elections in Kaduna state, hence the need for the INEC to conduct it’s activities regarding the elections farly and credibly in the interest of Nigeria’s and Kaduna state’s reputation.

“Unfortunately, the transition to civilian rule has not delivered democratically accountable government for Nigerians. Nigeria has not held a free and fair general election since the end of military rule. Though, that is contestable, but not far from the truth that people’s will are always being short-changed, Rahila Adamu  emphasized.

She added that INEC should allow leadership to envolved from the people, saying that leaders who came to power through fraudulent process have generally not realized the hopes of Nigerians for socio-economic advancement and better governance.

“The concept of leadership evolving from the people reflects a shift towards more collaborative, inclusive, and people-oriented styles of leadership that brings about good governance, and this is the dream of the people,” Rahila Adamu said.

The Chieftain therefore called on the people of  Chikun/Kajuru and Zaria Kewaye/Zaria Sabon Gari Federal Constituencies to give their massive support, and vote ADC as their choice party in the coming by-elections scheduled for Friday, 16th August, 2025.

Rahila Adamu also urged the members to vigilant and monitor the election process from the begining to the end diligently and not to allow any form of manipulation to take place either at the polling units or at the collation centres.

In the statement, she enjoined the security agencies to be neutral, stressing that their work is to protect any form of security breach, and not to involve themselves in any form of human rights abuse.

Mining Marshals Shut Down Illegal Quarry in Kuje

5

By Martha Agas

The Mining Marshals have shut down an illegal quarry site operating within the Kuje Area Council of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja.

The Commander, ACC Attah Onoja, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Friday that the site was shut down on Aug. 31, and 13 suspects have been apprehended.

The Quarry

NAN reports that the Mining Marshals, drawn from the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), are a security unit initiated by the Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dr Dele Alake, in 2024 to secure mining sites.

According to Onoja, the 13 suspects are currently in custody and will soon be arraigned in court as investigations are still ongoing.

“The suspects were found to be working for a company which had allegedly occupied and exploited a quarry lease belonging to another licenced mining company for over seven months without legal backing.

“This operation underscores our commitment to zero tolerance for illegality in the Nigerian mining sector and we will not allow any individual or company to take the law into their own hands or deprive legitimate operators of their lawful rights,” he said.

The commander warned mining operators to comply with the  legal and environmental standards regulating the sector or face the consequences.

“The era of impunity in the mining sector is over. We will continue to identify, investigate, and prosecute all violators, no matter how remote or discreet their operations may be,” he said.

Onoja reiterated the commitment of  authorities to restoring order, transparency, and accountability to Nigeria’s mining landscape as part of the broader national agenda to diversify the economy and enhance internal security.

He explained the unit was established to address illegal mining, which had contributed to revenue loss, environmental degradation, and community conflict in various parts of the country.

“The unit has also been tasked with enforcing compliance with mining regulations and ensuring that all mining activities across the federation are conducted within the bounds of the law.

“The Mining Marshals are motivated by the tacit guidelines of the Commandant General of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, Prof Ahmed Abubakar Audi.

Nigeria 2027: ADC Consolidates On Membership, Repositions To Take Over Kaduna

0

The Kaduna state Chapter of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), says it  has strengthened it’s membership scope and restrategized to wrest power from the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kaduna state.

At its leadership meeting in Kaduna on Thursday, the leadership of the party emphasized it’s readiness, just as it’s disclosed that the party is well structured and is now the alternative political party to the people of the state.

Speaking at the meeting, the Kaduna state Chairman of the party, Elder Patric Ambut applauded the interest shown by the Kaduna state residents in joining the party as a credible alternative to the APC.

Ambut, while speaking, he stressed the need for synergy amongst the Coalition partners. “Our doors are opened for anybody that has the same ideology with the ADC, and we are willing to work with all our partners for ADC to take over the state and the country at large in 2027.”

The Chairman added that ADC is already laying a foundation that will bring change of government  in the state, saying that every single individual are now ready to associate with the party.

” We must not deny the fact that people are no longer happy with the APC style of leadership, hence the need for ADC to take over power in 2027 both at the state level and at the national level. I am using this opportunity to call on all our party members to go back to their wards and revalidate their membership,” Ambut said.

While fielding questions from journalists, the immediate past Chairman of the party, Hon. Philemon Kure, also said that the ADC is the breathe of fresh air.

According to him, ADC prioritizes a democratic and united Nigeria, with a focus on the welfare of its citizens, adding that ADC is what the people of Kaduna and Nigeria wanted.

” ADC is a party that advocates for policies that foster national unity, economic growth, and improved living standards for all Nigerians,” Kure said.

Revisiting Nigeria’s Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) Of The 1980s, By Kassim Muhammad Ibrahim

0
Nigeria's fomer military president, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (credit: internet)

The 1980s were a turbulent time for Nigeria, marked by significant economic downturns, falling oil prices, and mounting debt. In response, Nigeria, like many other developing countries, implemented the Structural Adjustment Program (SAP), a set of economic policies introduced under the guidance of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. While these policies were designed to restore economic stability and growth, they also led to significant social and economic challenges that continue to reverberate in the country today.

Now, more than 30 years later, it might be time for Nigeria to revisit those policies, assess where things went wrong, and explore how to amend them in the context of the country’s current economic realities. This reflection could be critical to crafting policies that foster sustainable economic development and alleviate poverty.

What Was the Structural Adjustment Program (SAP)? Implemented in 1986 by the military government of General Ibrahim Babangida, the SAP aimed to address the severe economic crisis Nigeria was facing at the time. Some key measures of the SAP included:

  1. Devaluation of the Naira: To promote exports and reduce trade imbalances.
  2. Trade Liberalization: Opening up the Nigerian economy to foreign competition by reducing import tariffs and restrictions.
  3. Deregulation and Privatization: Reducing the role of the government in business by privatizing state-owned enterprises.
  4. Austerity Measures: Cutting public spending, particularly in social sectors such as education, health, and infrastructure.
  5. Removal of Subsidies: Reducing or eliminating subsidies, especially on essential commodities like fuel and agriculture.

Where Did Nigeria Go Wrong? While the SAP was intended to reverse economic decline, several key aspects of its implementation and consequences may have contributed to deeper economic challenges. Understanding these missteps can provide valuable insights into what could be amended today:

  1. Excessive Naira Devaluation: While devaluation was intended to make Nigerian exports more competitive, it led to a dramatic fall in the value of the naira, which in turn caused a spike in inflation. This hurt the purchasing power of ordinary Nigerians and deepened poverty.
  2. Over-Reliance on Oil: SAP policies did not adequately address Nigeria’s over-dependence on oil exports. The sharp devaluation and trade liberalization were implemented without the necessary support for diversifying the economy, leaving Nigeria vulnerable to global oil price shocks.
  3. Social Impact: The austerity measures, including cuts to social spending, exacerbated inequalities. As subsidies were removed and public services were reduced, access to education, healthcare, and other social services declined for large sections of the population.
  4. Weak Institutions: While privatization aimed to improve efficiency, it was often poorly managed, with many state assets sold off without adequate regulatory frameworks. This resulted in monopolistic practices and further weakened sectors that should have driven economic growth.
  5. Lack of Accountability and Corruption: The era of SAP coincided with a high level of corruption in government. The gains from the privatization and liberalization processes were often siphoned off, leading to widespread public distrust in the economic reforms.

Why Revisiting SAP Policies Is Relevant Today Nigeria’s economy still struggles with many of the same issues that the SAP was meant to address: over-reliance on oil, high inflation, unemployment, and a weak currency. While the global economy has evolved, Nigeria can benefit from revisiting the SAP policies to understand what can be corrected and adapted for today’s circumstances. Here are some areas that warrant re-examination:

  1. Exchange Rate Management: Instead of the extreme devaluation policies of the 1980s, a more managed exchange rate system could be explored today to strike a balance between maintaining competitiveness and protecting the purchasing power of the population. Collaborative efforts between the Central Bank of Nigeria and global financial institutions could help craft a more sustainable currency management policy.
  2. Economic Diversification: Unlike in the 1980s, when the SAP failed to diversify the economy, current policies could focus more on encouraging sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, and technology. Special attention could be given to industries that have shown growth potential, such as fintech, agro-processing, and renewable energy.
  3. Social Protection Programs: Rather than cutting social spending as was done during the SAP era, the government today should invest in building a robust social safety net. Subsidies may be restructured to target the most vulnerable populations, ensuring that basic goods and services are affordable, while also prioritizing education, healthcare, and infrastructure.
  4. Transparency and Accountability: SAP’s implementation was marred by corruption and a lack of transparency. Today, government reforms should ensure that economic policies are implemented with strong oversight mechanisms to reduce the likelihood of mismanagement. Digital tools and independent auditing bodies can ensure that the benefits of reforms reach the intended population.
  5. Privatization Reforms: Nigeria can revisit the lessons of past privatization efforts and focus on strategic sectors where government involvement is still needed. Where privatization is necessary, there must be robust frameworks to ensure that public assets are fairly valued and that competition is promoted to prevent monopolies from forming.

Collaboration with Current Policies Amending the SAP policies should not be a return to the same playbook of the 1980s. Instead, it must involve an integration of current global best practices, Nigeria’s unique economic landscape, and the country’s broader development goals. For instance:

  • The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) offers an opportunity to boost Nigeria’s manufacturing and export sectors. By aligning trade liberalization with regional cooperation, Nigeria could harness the benefits of a larger market while protecting its industries. • Climate Action and Green Economy: Nigeria could integrate lessons from the past into the growing global movement towards a green economy. The transition to renewable energy and sustainable agricultural practices could become a cornerstone of Nigeria’s diversification agenda. • Youth Engagement and Innovation: Current policies need to focus on equipping Nigeria’s burgeoning youth population with the skills and opportunities to participate in the modern, digital economy. Policies that support entrepreneurship, technology, and innovation will help to ensure that economic reforms create meaningful employment opportunities.

The Structural Adjustment Program of the 1980s undoubtedly played a crucial role in shaping Nigeria’s economic trajectory. However, many of its policies were either poorly implemented or failed to address the underlying structural challenges that continue to hold back Nigeria’s development today. Revisiting those policies—not with the intent of re-adopting them wholesale but rather to learn from their successes and mistakes—could offer valuable insights for Nigeria’s current economic challenges.

By focusing on currency management, economic diversification, social protection, transparency, and privatization reforms, Nigeria can amend its past mistakes and chart a path forward that promotes inclusive growth. With collaboration between government, international partners, and civil society, Nigeria can leverage the lessons of the past to build a more resilient and equitable economy for the future.

Ibrahim writes in from Abuja

Somalia Between Red Sea And ‘GERD’ Faultline, By Abukar Arman

0
Map of Somalia

I don’t know who coined the phrase ‘a pessimist is an experienced optimist,’ but I find some comfort in it when analyzing current and the foreseeable future of Somalia.

The fourth-year political fever is running high once again. The same failed politicians, the same overambitious dual-citizen candidates, and the same Halane loyalists who believe that political legitimacy is an endorsement that a candidate must acquire from foreign elements who operate out of the Mogadishu Green Zone are dominating hotel ballroom stages. Yet, many are naïve enough or are willfully blind enough to expect a positive outcome on May 16, 2026, the day after the incumbent President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s term ends.

Aside from the random tokenism offered by one side or another, none of these candidates are offering or have been working on a viable, Somali-owned reconciliation process followed by a constitutional convention.

President Mohamud, like the president before him (Farmajo), has been dangling a political carrot named one-person-one-vote at the most impracticable time. There are many factors that are likely to make such an electoral process a pie in the clouds. Chief among them is the chronic division between the central government and other key political entities such as the secessionist Somaliland, semi-secessionist Puntland, and the agnostic federal-state of Jubbaland whose militias have engaged in a deadly fight against federal special forces several months ago.

Then there are historically prominent regions such as Hiiran and Gedo with grievances of being treated underhandedly by the current brand of federalism. These enduring divisions and distrust have exposed Somalia and turned it into a handful of clan-based political entities that are nothing more than exclusive spheres of influence of various foreign powers.

Puntland is now readying itself to wage a war against the newly formed North-Eastern region (SSC-Khatumo) which is backed by the federal government over the strategic and gold-rich Sanaag. Aside from the ‘territorial integrity’ ‘clan freewill’ and ‘adherence to the constitution’ arguments made by these three actors, that region, like any other region in Somalia is not free of foreign interference and influence. That region is coveted by UAE and Israel to boost their joint defense and strategic dominance on all waters that lead to the Red Sea to encircle the Houthis.

Of course, this dysfunctional attitude gets in the way of the critical questions: How can Somalia emerge out of the current quagmire of being divided into clan territories exploited by one foreign master or another? What is the best strategy for surviving the current geopolitical storms raging in the Horn of Africa, the Red Sea, and the Middle East?

Resurgence of the Ethiopian Hegemony 

In recent months, al-Shabaab recaptured many strategic towns such as Adan Yabaal, Masaajid Ali Guduud, Mahas, and Moqakori from the government forces. And this has quickly fueled the sensationalized narrative that al-Shabaab will soon be marching into Mogadishu in a Taliban-like fashion.

Over the past decades, they have proven to be a perfect pawn to advance geopolitical objectives, domestic extorsion, or for milking cash out of foreign projects- the miserably failed Ma’wisley campaign to defeat al-Shabaab being one such project.

The controversial Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) has been completed, and Ethiopia is set to open the mega dam in September in a total disregard to the existential concerns expressed by Egypt and Sudan that such project could impact flow of the Nile River. The US is apparently on Egypt and Sudan’s side of the argument. President Trump said the dam was “closing up water going to the Nile.”

Trump, who in 2020 suggested Egypt to blow-up the dam has in recent weeks claimed that the GERD was built “with United States money, largely.” Ethiopia categorically denied that claim. And when Trump doubled down and publicly repeated the same claim, an Ethiopian official said: “there is no evidence that US funded the project” and that the whole project was an Ethiopian funded.

Was Trump referring to the US endorsed dark seed money bankrolled by UAE at the time when Egypt was considered a threat to Israel? Time will tell. Today, Egypt is more important than ever. The Gaza ethnic-cleansing cannot be completed without Egypt.

Against that backdrop, Ethiopia is preparing for the worst-case-scenario- a joint attack from Egypt, Eritrea, and Sudan. So, Ethiopia is urgently reclaiming strategic areas within Somalia where Egypt, which already threatened and deployed troops and arms, could lead an attack. Ethiopia’s recent deadly attack and takeover of Dolow is part of said strategy. Likewise, al-Shabaab’s takeover of Mahas and Moqakori. Ethiopia’s al-Shabaab by proxy collaboration is nothing new.

Unlike these last two towns, the Dolow violent takeover had to be done in a way that would not create a blowback effect since President Mohamud, who is now attached at the hip with Ethiopia, has been preaching the last two years that Ethiopia was determined to annex Somalia. To affirm Somalia’s official consent, both President Mohamud and his Chief of Intelligence, Mahad Salad, had to be in Addis Ababa while Ethiopia was executing its bloody takeover of Dolow, of Gedo region.

Turkiye’s Risky Endeavor             

Adan Yabal and Masaajid Ali Guduud are part of the Hirshabelle federal state where Turkiye is set to deploy some of its special forces, private military corporations along with the Somali forces that it trained to protect its “mega project” that President Mohamud boasted “it will attract billions in investment and generate many jobs.”

Turkiye is in process of building a huge spaceport for rocket launching, long-range missile testing, and space exploration. Whether al-Shabaab’s presence there is a pretext or not, Turkiye’s expert feasibility study has identified the heart of Hirshabelle with its weather stability, low population density, and a convenient access to the Indian Ocean as the ideal location.

Puntland has recently intercepted the Sea World vessel carrying an assortment of heavy and light weapons being delivered to the Turkish base in Mogadishu.

Robinhoods of the Red Sea

By their defiant sustained asymmetric tactics to engage their much stronger enemies—Israel, US, and UK—Ansarullah who are famously known as the Houthis of Yemen have exposed the military, economic, and strategic vulnerability of the world’s most powerful geostrategic coalition.

The Houthis have been disrupting the international trade flow in the Red Sea. And in early July, the Houthis sank two commercial ships carrying goods to Israel. And last Sunday, the Houthis’ military spokesperson announced that the group will immediate launch the “fourth phase” of their unilateral imposition of economic blockade on Israel until they stop the genocide they have been committing in Gaza. The Houthis said they would target all ships belonging to all companies that do business with Israel, regardless of their nationalities. This would include American ships.

All countries that “want to avoid this escalation (must) pressure the enemy to halt its aggression and lift the blockade on the Gaza Strip,” the spokesman added. Within hours, Egypt was given the green light to open the Rafah crossing and to allow limited number of trucks carrying food to go into Gaza. Of course, the Israeli forces still control Rafah which they took over more than a year ago.

Meanwhile, US, UK, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Israel are finalizing a joint strategy to defeat the Houthis. “The CIA estimates that anti-Houthi forces number around 300,000 fighters. They are well trained and well equipped. They are ready to attack the Houthis from different directions and take the Hudaydah strategic seaport to further strangulate the Houthis economically. Should that plan materializes, the Houthis will attack said coalition’s military bases in Somalia- Berbera, Bossaso, Hafoun, and Baledogle.

At the end of every four years, incumbents unlawfully demand an extension period. Ritualistically, once the contention between the incumbent and the opposition is about to cross over into the violence zone, a deal would be made to hold the presidential election. The day after the election, men in dark suits and shiny shoes would take over the Villa Somalia. No transitional period is necessary.

In the past quarter of a century, every new team, willingly or otherwise, has maintained status quo by placing the cart before the donkey. But, for the Lords of Politics: the circus must go on.
Arman is a former diplomat, author, and a widely published geopolitical analyst. He can be reached via abukar_arman@yahoo.com.

Muhammadu Buhari: Only For Himself, By Fidelis Ajuzie

0
Late former President of Nigeria, Muhammadu Buhari
Major Gen. Muhammadu Buhari was a bundle of contradictions. He was unquestionably Nigeria’s most divisive leader during his lifetime. His worldview was always one of north versus south, Fulanis vs other Nigerians, and Muslims vs Christians, as long as it served his narrow goal. In the quest for the presidency of a democratic Nigeria, he pretended to be a born-again personality.
In the North, youths of all shades trooped out in Kano, Kaduna, Zaria, Katsina, and even his home town of Daura, among other cities, in exuberant celebration of the exit of a man who quadrupled poverty in the region. In the South West, most Yorubas congregated in their various clubs to boisterously celebrate the death of Nigeria’s most incompetent leader. In Ikoyi Club, one member couldn’t contain himself:  “Although I stopped drinking beer and other forms of alcohol many years ago, today, I shall have a bottle of Star beer on Buhari”. Meanwhile, in the South East, the Igbos reportedly celebrated in such an organized manner as if they had been waiting for the “good” news for a long time. In Enugu, Onitsha, Aba, Owerri, Umuahia, and even the sleepy Abakaliki, it was as if the Igbos saved for the news of the demise of a man who hated them till death. In eatery after eatery, strangers were happily paying for each other’s food and drinks. One such patron proclaimed that he was happy “to celebrate the death of a man who referred to Igbo land as a dot but ironically died in another dot called England”. I truly enjoyed of all these in the social media.
It appears that Buhari loved being hated or that he considered the hatred he provoked as a badge of honour or validation of his coveted status as a Northern czar. However, under him, the north also suffered.
Obviously, Northern Nigeria was not a developed and prosperous region before Buhari assumed the Nigerian Presidency in 2015. But the gospel truth is that he met a poor North and left it poorer and more hated. According to the World Bank, Nigeria’s poverty rate was 31% in 2014, but it climbed to 49% after Buhari’s tenure in 2023, making the country the world’s poverty capital.
Perhaps, nothing better captures the man’s character than the view of the 1985 coup against him. The coupists said that “the initial objectives and programmes of action which were meant to have been implemented since the ascension to power of the Buhari Administration in January 1984 have been betrayed and discarded. The present state of uncertainty and stagnation cannot be permitted to degenerate into suppression and retrogression”.
Another signature of Buhari’s character is the way and manner he treated key Nigerians who toiled to make him President: Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu; Dr. Sule Hammah; Hajia Aisha Buhari; Chief Ikechi Emenike; Engr. Buba Galadima; Chief Mike Ahamba SAN; Mallam Nasir El Rufai; Dr. Hakeen Baba Ahmed; Gen. Abdurahman Dambazau, and a few others.
Later day Buharists can twist fact as much as they wish, but the only truth is that without Asiwaju Tinubu, in 2014, Gen. Buhari would have lost the APC presidential primaries in Lagos. While Asiwaju Tinubu deployed huge resources and emptied almost his entire political capital into the Buhari project against the formidable Atiku Abubakar candidature in the December 2014 APC Presidential primaries, Buhari, despite all his promises, still opposed Tinubu’s 2023 ambition. The brilliant and formidable Dr. Sule Hammah, with the unrelenting assistance of Engr. Buba Galadima, cleaned Buhari of excess baggage, rebranded him and presented him to Nigerians (nonetheless, they became his enemies).  Aisha Buhari went above and beyond the call of duty of a wife as she undertook several internal diplomatic shuttles and mended numerous broken political bridges to ensure that her husband was successful (yet, she was thrown to the wolves and treated in a way no first lady in Nigeria or elsewhere has been subjected to). Her ability to still summon courage to forgive a bad husband and plead with Nigerians to also do the same is a mark of her large heartedness. May God bless her richly. On his part, Chief Emenike was not only Buhari’s face in the South East, he also authored the strategy for Buhari’s 2015 victory, designed and populated the organogram, and with others, coordinated Buhari’s “difficult” primary election in Lagos, in November 2014. He also served as Director of Field Operations that coordinated all 36 states plus FCT (nevertheless, all Buhari had for him was to post him out as an Ambassador which the Chief quietly passed on to his wife). Everyone knows the role of Chief Mike Ahamba, who for 12 years, handled all Buhari’s political cases, including those that reached the Supreme Court, all on a pro bono basis (yet, upon his victory, Buhari pretended that Ahamba never existed). Of course, the messianic role of Mallam El Rufai does not require much elaboration. He was fortunate, however because he was also elected Governor of Kaduna State during this period. Similarly, Gen. Dambazau, and Dr. Hakeem Baba Ahmed played extraordinary roles. The reader is free to research how Buhari treated these genuine compatriots who put their lives and wellbeing on the line to make him President.
The reader can imagine what Nigeria, under Buhari, would have become with Dr. Sule Hammah as Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mallam Abba Kyari (Chief of Staff); Chief Mike Ahamba (Minister of Justice/AG); Gen. Abduraham Dambazau (Minister of Defence); Chief Ikechi Emenike (Minister of Finance); Engr Buba Galadima (Minister of Transportation) and Dr. Hakeem Baba Ahmed (Minister of Education). Dr. Kayode Fayemi would have been a much better Foreign Minister. These men and others, as a team, would have curtailed the antics of the villa rats that eventually grew too powerful and destructive. Just like Vice President Atiku Abubakar said, at that time, there were enough talent in APC to have lifted the country. These did not happen because Buhari had other thoughts or no thoughts at all.
Buhari was habitually cruel. He carried on as if he was doing a favour to everyone who worked for him. A clear example is that throughout his eight years in office, the man refused to observe even a minute silence for all the young men and women who died while working to make him President. Recall that even his bodyguards, who protected him against all odds during his more than 12-year political sojourn, even demonstrated in Eagle Square, Abuja for recognition and appreciation, to no avail.
What about me? I worked harder than I ever had in my life. I was one of the few people that worked in two important directorates of his campaign – Field Operations (under Chief Emenike) and Strategic Communications (under Mr. Dele Alake). I also served on an exclusive committee towards the tail of the campaign (again under Chief Emenike and Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu SAN). There was also a brilliant Nigerian Economics Professor from Adamawa or Taraba State, who was based in New York and another professor from Benue State. The assignment was to map out a first 100-day, daily agenda for the expected winner of the 2015 elections. Indeed, I was among several other young men and women, as well as older Nigerians who believed in a new Nigeria. But President Buhari COMPLETELY, and thoughtlessly ignored almost all of us once he assured office. In 2016, with my family, I was fortunate to flee from Buhari’s abandonment to Canada, where by the grace of God, I am living a decent life which any hardworking human being is entitled to. I have tried to drain myself of any ill-feelings towards Nigeria. This is not to suggest that I plan to return to Nigeria anytime soon, because there are still too many Buharis lurking in the Nigerian political space with absolutely no intention or capacity to move the country forward.
During his inaugural speech as President in 2015, Buhari said “I belong to everybody and I belong to nobody”. Most people, including yours sincerely, ignorantly applauded him without interrogating it, to understand that it simply meant that Buhari came to power for only himself: Not for Nigeria, Nigerians, or his wife, whom he said only belonged to “the kitchen, the living room and the other room”. Not even his truculent defenders and the greatest beneficiaries of his disastrous regime can explain the overriding reason why Gen Buhari persisted in contesting for the presidency four times, over 12 years.
For political and cultural reasons, President Tinubu was not wrong in according Buhari a presidential burial. But after the noise, Nigerians should fervently pray and thank God for surviving Buhari. Nigerians should also pray and plead with God not to grant Buhari’s soul any atom of rest. And perhaps, more importantly, Nigerians should faithfully pray that the maker of Heaven and Earth, in His infinite mercy, should not allow Buhari to escape from hell, and sauter again into Nigeria. May the cruelty and incompetence which Buhari represented never befall Nigeria again. Finally, may Nigeria move forward in unity and glory, now and forever.
Fidelis Ajuzie writes from Ottawa, Canada. He can be reached via

The Legacies Of President Muhammadu Buhari: The Lessons Are For The Living, By Imini Lucky

0
President Muhammadu Buhari of Nigeria (Credit: Ghana Report)

On the eve of July 13th, 2025, Nigerians both home and abroad officially received the sad news of the passing of former President Muhammadu Buhari. Unlike his kinsman Musa Yar’Adua, who died in office and was mourned with sadness and good wishes as a man of integrity—deemed democratically fit due to his good policies and adherence to the rule of law among other virtues—Buhari’s demise brought a lot of mixed feelings. For the first time, I saw videos of northerners, mostly youths, who were supposed to be bereaved because the man was from their region and also a former president, dancing and singing in excitement over his death. I was perplexed, to say the least.

They say, “Don’t speak ill of the dead,” but the living should remember that they will be judged by their actions in death. The Holy Bible clearly mentions men like Pharaoh, Judas, etc., who were wicked in their sojourn, and to this day we still speak of their atrocities (deeds). These stories are told so we won’t repeat their mistakes. Therefore, all I am going to list here won’t be to judge Buhari—as he is already facing or will face judgment—but as a reminder that “a good name is better than riches.” I didn’t experience his time as a military leader, but from opinions I have seen, it was a colossal failure.

However, I was privileged to experience the ineptitude and bigotry among other things, and I pray the present crop of leaders, mostly in the executive and the Senate (Senate leaders), will heed advice and common sense and do what is right.

Buhari, President of Nigeria (2015–2023), made some decisions that had significant political, economic, social, and security implications for the country. I will list but a few:

  1. Land Border Closure (2019–2021): This was supposed to be the best decision for our indigenous industries to increase production and stop smuggling. However, it turned out to be another hoax, as it resulted in food inflation, increased prices of goods, trade disruption, and violation of ECOWAS trade agreements, which did no good to ordinary Nigerians.
  2. Poor Handling of the #EndSARS Protests (2020): This was the highlight of his regime. Instead of integrating the new set of citizens born between 1999 and 2020—who were intolerant of his administration for obvious reasons and protested, which was ironically part of what gave him victory—he went ahead, whether directly or not, to give security forces the order to open fire on peaceful protesters. He covered it up and even arrested many others for exercising their civil rights. What a shame. May the souls of the departed at the time rest in peace. (If it were possible, I would have loved them to meet with him in the other realm where Buhari has no security. The pain for him when he sees them would have been unbearable—but I don’t have such powers.)
  3. Lopsided Appointments: It was almost normal during his tenure for key security positions, among others, to be occupied exclusively by a section of the North. In other words, he appointed key officials disproportionately from the North, thereby violating the federal character principle and heightening ethnic tension. He categorically stated that the 5% that didn’t vote for him shouldn’t expect much—and we saw the results.
  4. Over-Reliance on Borrowing: Nigeria became the poverty capital of the world with no real infrastructural investment for youth engagement, and our public debt ballooned to over ₦77 trillion. Future generations are now burdened with debt without visible infrastructure.
  5. Response to Banditry and Insecurity: Banditry was given special recognition and preference due to ethnic bigotry, while their counterparts in other parts of the country—whose killings, activities, and practices were far worse—were labeled terrorists. The bandits were “exalted” despite their atrocities. Mr. Buhari saw no reason to use the necessary force to curtail their excessive menace. He turned a blind eye while the Benue people and other parts of the country were burying, mourning, and sorrowing almost daily. Some sections of the country were treated as first-class citizens, while others were treated like lowlifes, especially in the North West and North Central, which were ravaged by banditry.
  6. Naira Redesign Policy (2022–2023): This was one of the worst policies, poorly executed by the CBN with Buhari’s backing. It created immense pain and hardship for Nigerians who wished to access their own hard-earned money. This led to severe cash scarcity, hurt the poor, disrupted the economy, and triggered chaos and crises such as the burning of financial institutions and killings.
  7. Increased Poverty and Unemployment: By 2022, over 63% of Nigerians were multidimensionally poor. Youth unemployment surged due to weak economic planning. Nigeria was declared the poverty capital of the world due to repressive, retrogressive, and insensitive policies targeted at the weaponization of poverty.

The list is endless for me, but I would like to stop here—not without naming a pocket of misguided decisions and other forms of poor policies. These include a weak anti-corruption strategy, which was seen as selective. High-profile corruption cases were stalled or dismissed. Undermining the judiciary and total disregard for the rule of law and court orders was very much pronounced (e.g., in the Dasuki and El-Zakzaky cases). He thus eroded confidence in the rule of law.

Conclusively and in summary: While Buhari had some achievements (like infrastructure development in rail construction, which I won’t fail to mention—as one can’t be entirely bad), many of his policy choices, appointments, and governance style were widely seen as autocratic and bigoted in nature, inefficient and inept by actions, poorly executed and mismanaged by his ministers and appointees who were directly answerable to him. He was out of touch with the people of Nigeria.

May God judge him according to His deeds and standards. I condole with the family on the loss of their father and husband.

Lucky, a political analyst writes from Delta State, Nigeria. He can be reached via Neroimini@gmail.com 

Currency Exchange Rates

USD - United States Dollar
ZAR
0.06
EUR
1.17
CAD
0.73
ILS
0.31
INR
0.01
GBP
1.34
CNY
0.14
Enable Notifications OK No thanks