China Lodges Tariff Case At WTO Against ‘The U.S.

Date:

US vs China

 

China has lodged a complaint against the United States at the World Trade Organisation over U.S. import duties, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said on Monday.

The U.S. began imposing 15 per cent tariffs on a variety of Chinese goods on Sunday and China began imposing new duties on U.S. crude oil, the latest escalation in their trade war.

China did not release details of its legal case but said the U.S. tariffs affected $300 billion of Chinese exports.

The latest tariff actions violated the consensus reached by leaders of China and the U.S. in a meeting in Osaka, the Commerce Ministry said in the statement.

China will defend its legal rights in accordance with WTO rules, it said.

The lawsuit is the third Beijing has brought to challenge U.S. President Donald Trump’s China-specific tariffs at the WTO, the international organisation that limits the tariffs each country is allowed to charge.

U.S. officials say they are penalising China for theft of intellectual property that is not covered by WTO rules, although many trade experts say that any tariff hike above the allowed maximum must be justified at the WTO.

Many experts also decry China’s decision to fight fire with fire, by imposing tariffs on U.S. goods imported into China, also without the WTO’s approval.

On Friday the U.S. published a written defence in the first of the three legal cases, asserting that China and the U.S. agreed the issue should not be judged at the WTO.

“China has taken the unilateral decision to adopt aggressive industrial policy measures to steal or otherwise unfairly acquire the technology of its trading partners.

“The U.S. has adopted tariff measures to try to obtain the elimination of China’s unfair and distortive technology-transfer policies,’’ it said.

China had chosen to respond not by addressing U.S. concerns but with its own tariffs, “in an effort to maintain its unfair policies indefinitely’’.

The U.S. submission also said its actions were exempt from WTO rules because they were “measures necessary to protect public morals’’ – a clause used in the past to argue for trade restrictions over gambling, animal rights and public broadcasting.

Under WTO rules, Washington has 60 days to try to settle the latest dispute.

Then China could ask the WTO to adjudicate, a process that would take several years.

It could end with China gaining WTO approval to take trade sanctions if the U.S. is found to have broken

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

You May Have Missed
Related

From Braids To African Delicacies: The Journey Of Linda Umaru

By Iliya Kure Linda Umaru, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)...

Nigeria: Dangote Refinery Accuses Fuel Importers Of Undermining Local Production

By Sunday Elijah, Lagos In a heated exchange, Dangote Refinery...

NAGAFF Partners Nigeria Customs On Stress Management In Maritime Industry

By Bon Peters, Port Harcourt  The National Association of Government...

Nigeria: High Costs Threaten Fish Supply in Kaduna as Fishermen Seek Assistance

By Ibrahima Yakubu  Nigerian fishermen are increasingly concerned about the...
Enable Notifications OK No thanks